5 Comments

I see you're a new stacker and have lots to say about what needs exposing, so welcome! (Found you via your comment on Sasha's latest post.) I don't have a scientific cell in my own brain but glad for those of you who do, and you explain things very clearly here.

Expand full comment

Thanks! That is MUCH appreciated. Yeah. I have a lot of stuff to say indeed.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your work, I also don’t have a scientific brain so just trying to understand. I was recommended by Sonia Elijah whom I’m grateful to. I’m trying to understand the origins of the S1S2 used in Process 1, so please bear with me.

Christine Massey and others have argued that Covid 19 has never been isolated and categorised, so what is the source/origin of this cell free linear method. Was it designed on computer. Excuse my ignorance. 🙏

Expand full comment

I try not to get into arguments about SARS-CoV2 and isolation etc. As far as I am concerned, it has been identified in infected patients in accordance with usual virology standards.

However, Process 1 batches was made from the in silico or computer code of the virus. A standard plasmid was used and the code inserted into the plasmid. THe plasmid was NOT put into E coli. It is primarily a chemical technique. Then they amplified the DNA using PCR (dont ask me how this works). So contrary to what you hear, there WAS DNA fragments in Process 1 vials. It was not a plasmid with genes that code for regulatory activity though, so basically unreactive DNA. No promoters, enhancers, restriction enzymes yada yada. Plus the purification of this mRNA uses magnetic beads which are very precise to separate mRNA from DNA. This is not done on Process 2 vials

Expand full comment

Thank you, I’m very grateful 🙏

Expand full comment