I find this whole interaction to be bizarre. Under traditional approaches to product liability, Pfizer delivered a defective product. It had a manufacturing defect since it deviated from the agreed-upon specifications. It had a design defect because it had features that apparently served no functional role but which made the product less safe.
Yet Health Canada is showing enormous amounts of deference to a company that received the benefit of a rather large contract. The entire regulatory and procurement process is just so murky and fraught with additional considerations that it is kind of baffling to an outsider.
I can understand that. It takes a while to understand regulations and their applications. I can say though, that this is not SOP. That's why this is so unusual and disturbing.
I would say that Health Canada did not give Pfizer as much consideration as the FDA did, and felt that it could not act on its own. I find that quite concerning.
What a tortuous path required to shake out crumbs from the communique between departments.
It's a good thing the public is covid weary and doesn't care or understand the underlying implications of the residual DNA.
A friend reported the sudden passing of his brother from pancreatic cancer. He also reports his son with some other cancer and his own wife as well potentially with a third type of cancer.
They are all fully covid19 vaccinated. Is it related? Who knows... no one. There are no data studies that can confirm the relationship between the found DNA SV40 promoter and the rising cancers or excess deaths.
Excellent stuff. All that's missing is for a young Harrison Ford to turn this into a medical Bourne Identity film cast with inept and corrupt doctors and bureaucrats, and vicious pharma execs.
Re Sharma. Call me an old fashioned Gen Xer but pediatricians should not hold the positions she holds. As the first line of pharma offence, they're committed to vaccines and therefore can't by their nature be objective assessing the risks for adults - that is, the entire population.
Re the inspection of the Pfizer plant in Kirkland. Q: "Who was the first President of the United States?" A: Thomas Lincoln? Not the answer we were looking for but we got a good feeling about you. PASS!
This was like reading a mystery/ espionage novel… a terrific read as it was eloquently written! Thank you for all your endeavors and I will be saying the Rosary!
Cld it be you wanting it both ways? You cannot defend a narrative without fact. It is like the ‘69 moon golf supporters who when pressed for fact can only come up with, “well it wld have been easier TO DO SEVEN times than to FAKE once...”
Was nothing learned from the fake c*v*d pandemic..? Science moved away from invivo- real world observational science to insilico to better control their results- & “viruses” failed real world testing. We could also remember mullis’ warnings about diagnostic use...
Often folk who protect their “virus” narrative laugh at the dilution & microscopy of homoeopathy. Uh? Even prof montagnier- [who despite his 2 nobel prix was guilty of some shonky lab science in earlier days-] stood in front of the annual nobel awards & stated homoeopathy is real & works. While that of course got him laughed out of all western science & funding- the chinese quickly took him in & built him the worlds most hi-tech lab.
That tell you something?
Many scientists will refer to “viruses,” for acceptance- for to do otherwise is banishment. Does not mean they all blindly accept the “virus” narrative. What happened to debate- the first law of science?
I for one have proved homoeopathy. I have yet to prove the mechanisms of “viruses.”
While not directly on point of the article I feel compelled to post this for the consideration of people who come along these threads and say things like, "There are no such things as viruses" and "Viruses have never been isolated and therefore never been proven to exist."
Those same folks will look at articles like this one and say, "See how dangerous the drugs are. They are contaminated with DNA, they produce spike protein with such-and-such amino acid sequences..." and so on. How do those people think that good scientists are proving the contents of the slab jabs? By what techniques? Are they not the same techniques used to prove, isolate and examine the genetic makeup of a virus?
Can't have it both ways. Either all of the genetic analysis and tools are phony and fake or the tools work both for good and evil.
It's the same thing with the latest "hurricane weapon" proponents. Can't say there's a weapon that makes hurricanes and fail to explain why there are no hurricanes in February or why they can be forecast to not only develop but take a particular path almost two weeks in advance.
We've had active experimentation in weather control for century now. Look at all the technological advances in the last century and do u think maybe they could have gotten a little better with weaponization of weather also?
This is pathetic. Experiments have been conducted in all manner of pseudoscience including making a "vaccine" with mRNA. Experiments are not evidence of capability. You are deep down the psyop conspiracy hole and have a bar set so low for proof of something that I imagine you believe in everything from UFOs to climate change. My post did exactly what it was intended to do: smoke out people who come into channels of people attempting to do legitimate public service and contaminate them with crackpot theories that big media can use to smear the good guys. Now people can look at your posts and know exactly what you are up to. Thank you.
I rarely insult people im debating with but in this case i may make an exception for you Ruth because of your inability to extrapolate the fact that I meant successfully experimented on weather modification Also if you took the time to follow the link i left you or did any research whatsoever, youd realize that yes we can successfully modify weather patterns to the disadvantag of our enemies and ourselves. . In multiple states you can get a license for cloud seedng at this point which is weather modification, which can be used as weather weaponization. None of this is a secret. None of this is in any way, shape, or form hidden from anyone. We have the ability to control the weather. Your ignorance of that fact does not alter the fact the we know how to heat and chill parts of the atmosphere to control the weather.
And no, you did not set a trap to smoke out gullible people. You dunning kruegered yourself spectacularly! Kudos.
Why would they put SV40 Simian monkey virus into these C-19 injections unless they wanted to cause cancer? Where did they get it and who decided to include it? The Jonas Salk polio vax also contained SV40 from the vaccine being grown on monkey kidneys and it caused soft tissue cancers, as well as caused cancer on the lungs and bones. And the polio vax was given around the world until 2000, even when it wasn't needed.
wow, this will take me a while to comb over. Thank you so much, more proof collated into one piece makes it even harder to revoke the idea that just about everything to do with Covid
This is quite the tour de force. Thanks, as ever, for the work that you do.
Thank you!
Part 2 gets even juicier. Someone should write a book. (not me, though. I'm working on something as it is)
I find this whole interaction to be bizarre. Under traditional approaches to product liability, Pfizer delivered a defective product. It had a manufacturing defect since it deviated from the agreed-upon specifications. It had a design defect because it had features that apparently served no functional role but which made the product less safe.
Yet Health Canada is showing enormous amounts of deference to a company that received the benefit of a rather large contract. The entire regulatory and procurement process is just so murky and fraught with additional considerations that it is kind of baffling to an outsider.
I can understand that. It takes a while to understand regulations and their applications. I can say though, that this is not SOP. That's why this is so unusual and disturbing.
I would say that Health Canada did not give Pfizer as much consideration as the FDA did, and felt that it could not act on its own. I find that quite concerning.
That bothered me as well.
The deference shown might be due in part to the amount of funding HC receives from Pfizer.
Good point, it would be interesting to see what % of their funding comes from companies like Pfizer.
I know in the medical device space that they basically rely on applicants to do all the testing. They don't do much due diligence at all.
Very helpful to have this all in one place, thank you
Holy Toledo!
What a tortuous path required to shake out crumbs from the communique between departments.
It's a good thing the public is covid weary and doesn't care or understand the underlying implications of the residual DNA.
A friend reported the sudden passing of his brother from pancreatic cancer. He also reports his son with some other cancer and his own wife as well potentially with a third type of cancer.
They are all fully covid19 vaccinated. Is it related? Who knows... no one. There are no data studies that can confirm the relationship between the found DNA SV40 promoter and the rising cancers or excess deaths.
Excellent stuff. All that's missing is for a young Harrison Ford to turn this into a medical Bourne Identity film cast with inept and corrupt doctors and bureaucrats, and vicious pharma execs.
Re Sharma. Call me an old fashioned Gen Xer but pediatricians should not hold the positions she holds. As the first line of pharma offence, they're committed to vaccines and therefore can't by their nature be objective assessing the risks for adults - that is, the entire population.
Re the inspection of the Pfizer plant in Kirkland. Q: "Who was the first President of the United States?" A: Thomas Lincoln? Not the answer we were looking for but we got a good feeling about you. PASS!
This was like reading a mystery/ espionage novel… a terrific read as it was eloquently written! Thank you for all your endeavors and I will be saying the Rosary!
God bless
it is obvious the SV40 was added to enhance the jabs depopulation potency as per Bill's specs.
So it is dying suddenly or wasting away with cancer or some other horrible disease? And 70% of our population is injected with this poison?
We are so grateful for you and your team. Jesus will bring truth out in his timing.
It's called "circling the wagons".
They will hunker down as long as they can.
awesome research thanks all,
ah, re yr post, dear ruth.
Cld it be you wanting it both ways? You cannot defend a narrative without fact. It is like the ‘69 moon golf supporters who when pressed for fact can only come up with, “well it wld have been easier TO DO SEVEN times than to FAKE once...”
Was nothing learned from the fake c*v*d pandemic..? Science moved away from invivo- real world observational science to insilico to better control their results- & “viruses” failed real world testing. We could also remember mullis’ warnings about diagnostic use...
Often folk who protect their “virus” narrative laugh at the dilution & microscopy of homoeopathy. Uh? Even prof montagnier- [who despite his 2 nobel prix was guilty of some shonky lab science in earlier days-] stood in front of the annual nobel awards & stated homoeopathy is real & works. While that of course got him laughed out of all western science & funding- the chinese quickly took him in & built him the worlds most hi-tech lab.
That tell you something?
Many scientists will refer to “viruses,” for acceptance- for to do otherwise is banishment. Does not mean they all blindly accept the “virus” narrative. What happened to debate- the first law of science?
I for one have proved homoeopathy. I have yet to prove the mechanisms of “viruses.”
While not directly on point of the article I feel compelled to post this for the consideration of people who come along these threads and say things like, "There are no such things as viruses" and "Viruses have never been isolated and therefore never been proven to exist."
Those same folks will look at articles like this one and say, "See how dangerous the drugs are. They are contaminated with DNA, they produce spike protein with such-and-such amino acid sequences..." and so on. How do those people think that good scientists are proving the contents of the slab jabs? By what techniques? Are they not the same techniques used to prove, isolate and examine the genetic makeup of a virus?
Can't have it both ways. Either all of the genetic analysis and tools are phony and fake or the tools work both for good and evil.
It's the same thing with the latest "hurricane weapon" proponents. Can't say there's a weapon that makes hurricanes and fail to explain why there are no hurricanes in February or why they can be forecast to not only develop but take a particular path almost two weeks in advance.
Oh the hurricane weapon topic, it's not a matter of creatting hurricanes. It is a matter of intensifying and redirecting the hurricanes. I believe the first recorded use of dry ice to divert a hurricane was in the 1940s. https://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hurricane_blog/70th-anniversary-of-the-first-hurricane-seeding-experiment/#:~:text=On%20the%20afternoon%20of%20October%2013%2C%201947%2C,cyclone%20by%20seeding%20it%20with%20freezing%20nuclei. Unfortunately it was divertedt in the wrong direction. On top of that were multiple declassified weather ops during the Vietnam war so the straw man argument you are using against weather weaponization is dead on arrival.
We've had active experimentation in weather control for century now. Look at all the technological advances in the last century and do u think maybe they could have gotten a little better with weaponization of weather also?
This is pathetic. Experiments have been conducted in all manner of pseudoscience including making a "vaccine" with mRNA. Experiments are not evidence of capability. You are deep down the psyop conspiracy hole and have a bar set so low for proof of something that I imagine you believe in everything from UFOs to climate change. My post did exactly what it was intended to do: smoke out people who come into channels of people attempting to do legitimate public service and contaminate them with crackpot theories that big media can use to smear the good guys. Now people can look at your posts and know exactly what you are up to. Thank you.
I rarely insult people im debating with but in this case i may make an exception for you Ruth because of your inability to extrapolate the fact that I meant successfully experimented on weather modification Also if you took the time to follow the link i left you or did any research whatsoever, youd realize that yes we can successfully modify weather patterns to the disadvantag of our enemies and ourselves. . In multiple states you can get a license for cloud seedng at this point which is weather modification, which can be used as weather weaponization. None of this is a secret. None of this is in any way, shape, or form hidden from anyone. We have the ability to control the weather. Your ignorance of that fact does not alter the fact the we know how to heat and chill parts of the atmosphere to control the weather.
And no, you did not set a trap to smoke out gullible people. You dunning kruegered yourself spectacularly! Kudos.
Why would they put SV40 Simian monkey virus into these C-19 injections unless they wanted to cause cancer? Where did they get it and who decided to include it? The Jonas Salk polio vax also contained SV40 from the vaccine being grown on monkey kidneys and it caused soft tissue cancers, as well as caused cancer on the lungs and bones. And the polio vax was given around the world until 2000, even when it wasn't needed.
Ruth Gordon
You are the one that got smoked out!
Andy West is correct about the weather mod tech unfortunately!
Hopefully one day you will take the red pill and wake up out of the Matrix.
wow, this will take me a while to comb over. Thank you so much, more proof collated into one piece makes it even harder to revoke the idea that just about everything to do with Covid
Hi, one more step. Trudeau calls for the complete destruction of all vials in Canada to rid of the evidence this fall.