If this is not scary, I don't know what is. Imperiling everyone and every living thing with an unproven theory despite tons of evidence of numerous serious errors and gaps. We don't know hardly anything about the key players involved in isolation, let alone when combined and let loose...
I know next to nothing about all of this but there definitely needs to be more thinking than tinkering with the human body. John R. Platt has it right, wise words from 60 years ago, there definitely needs to be more questions asked and more knowledge gained step by step rather than rushing in with reckless human experimentation.
The mRNA vaccines got into the cells lining the blood vessels and caused the cells to present spike fragment antigens on the surface of the infected cells (Major histocompatibility complex, MHC, antigen presentation). The T cells then went in and destroyed those antigen presenting cells, this is the root cause of all the blood clots and auto immunities,
All the people saying mRNA can clean up its act and be used in the future are dangerous.
It's not new, that the way of administration has an influence where the stuff ends.
"Systemically delivered mRNA–LNP complexes mainly target the liver […], and intradermal, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration have been shown to produce prolonged protein expression at the site of the injection. The mechanisms of mRNA escape into the cytoplasm are incompletely understood, not only for artificial liposomes but also for naturally occurring exosomes. Further research into this area will likely be of great benefit to the field of therapeutic RNA delivery.
The magnitude and duration of in vivo protein production from mRNA–LNP vaccines can be controlled in part by varying the route of administration. Intramuscular and intradermal delivery of mRNA–LNPs has been shown to result in more persistent protein expression than systemic delivery routes."
Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Apr;17(4):261-279. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.243. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PMID: 29326426; PMCID: PMC5906799. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243
"Because saRNA is not codon-optimized and doesn’t use N-1-methylpseudouridine, she likely thinks it will be safe for autoimmune disease as you’ll avoid the frameshifting."
No mention of the relevance of the protein you are expressing? This reveals a disturbing lack of basic understanding of molecular mimicry and autoimmunity.
And did they mention how protein expression and duration (the AUC) varies in a logarithmic range from person to person, so dosing it accurately is potluck? Willful blindness.
That's what Herschlag was saying! Anna doesn't care about that kind of stuff. It is a problem for someone else to figure out. She's just making vectors.
They are siloed and have no curiosity. It is just an engineering problem to solve.
Nah.. ya think that thinking and problem solving will reign and save the day? I doubt it. The more these folks play with science the greater hubris they develop as if the more they uncover they think they have mastered a complex system. If they were really thinking they would soon recognize that they indeed have such a cursory understanding that they should temper their optima and desire for a patent and profits with actual scientific inquiry that goes beyond asking AI…….IMHO we are Fearfully and Wonderully Made. There is much that has been created to heal us and to prevent much of modern disease. But that means we must avoid much of what man has created and especially man’s pharmacopoeia. Hubris in science is dangerous and it is a sinful mindset.
Of course not. I think that is what Pratt was saying 60yrs ago. The complexity maybe beyond us and we need to think FIRST and what SHOULD be solved. If at all.
They are all technocrats and materialists. They think they can solve anything. That Anna girl was scary.
How does turning your cells into viral antigens cause immunity and not disease? “Those who convince you of absurdity, can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire
If this is not scary, I don't know what is. Imperiling everyone and every living thing with an unproven theory despite tons of evidence of numerous serious errors and gaps. We don't know hardly anything about the key players involved in isolation, let alone when combined and let loose...
I know next to nothing about all of this but there definitely needs to be more thinking than tinkering with the human body. John R. Platt has it right, wise words from 60 years ago, there definitely needs to be more questions asked and more knowledge gained step by step rather than rushing in with reckless human experimentation.
The mRNA vaccines got into the cells lining the blood vessels and caused the cells to present spike fragment antigens on the surface of the infected cells (Major histocompatibility complex, MHC, antigen presentation). The T cells then went in and destroyed those antigen presenting cells, this is the root cause of all the blood clots and auto immunities,
All the people saying mRNA can clean up its act and be used in the future are dangerous.
Thanks for this excellent summary, Maria!
It's not new, that the way of administration has an influence where the stuff ends.
"Systemically delivered mRNA–LNP complexes mainly target the liver […], and intradermal, intramuscular and subcutaneous administration have been shown to produce prolonged protein expression at the site of the injection. The mechanisms of mRNA escape into the cytoplasm are incompletely understood, not only for artificial liposomes but also for naturally occurring exosomes. Further research into this area will likely be of great benefit to the field of therapeutic RNA delivery.
The magnitude and duration of in vivo protein production from mRNA–LNP vaccines can be controlled in part by varying the route of administration. Intramuscular and intradermal delivery of mRNA–LNPs has been shown to result in more persistent protein expression than systemic delivery routes."
Pardi N, Hogan MJ, Porter FW, Weissman D. mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018 Apr;17(4):261-279. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.243. Epub 2018 Jan 12. PMID: 29326426; PMCID: PMC5906799. https://www.nature.com/articles/nrd.2017.243
"Because saRNA is not codon-optimized and doesn’t use N-1-methylpseudouridine, she likely thinks it will be safe for autoimmune disease as you’ll avoid the frameshifting."
No mention of the relevance of the protein you are expressing? This reveals a disturbing lack of basic understanding of molecular mimicry and autoimmunity.
And did they mention how protein expression and duration (the AUC) varies in a logarithmic range from person to person, so dosing it accurately is potluck? Willful blindness.
That's what Herschlag was saying! Anna doesn't care about that kind of stuff. It is a problem for someone else to figure out. She's just making vectors.
They are siloed and have no curiosity. It is just an engineering problem to solve.
Nah.. ya think that thinking and problem solving will reign and save the day? I doubt it. The more these folks play with science the greater hubris they develop as if the more they uncover they think they have mastered a complex system. If they were really thinking they would soon recognize that they indeed have such a cursory understanding that they should temper their optima and desire for a patent and profits with actual scientific inquiry that goes beyond asking AI…….IMHO we are Fearfully and Wonderully Made. There is much that has been created to heal us and to prevent much of modern disease. But that means we must avoid much of what man has created and especially man’s pharmacopoeia. Hubris in science is dangerous and it is a sinful mindset.
Of course not. I think that is what Pratt was saying 60yrs ago. The complexity maybe beyond us and we need to think FIRST and what SHOULD be solved. If at all.
They are all technocrats and materialists. They think they can solve anything. That Anna girl was scary.
That was my way of totally agreeing with you. Sorry it was confusing in that regard.
Ye gads ! Well stated...scarey ! Rosary by my side. Thank you for sharing your
observations. Best Regards, KMcC.
How does turning your cells into viral antigens cause immunity and not disease? “Those who convince you of absurdity, can make you commit atrocities.” Voltaire