Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steve's avatar

Great article on the complexity of this modRNA poison.

Anything that interferes with the day to day operations of your cells, anything that interferes with the unique and delicately timed genetic expression of your cell is deadly in the first place.

They KNOW this...

The reason to put it in your body was "SARS CoV 2" o/"covid" immunity, but there was no way this could work without primarily destroying cellular operations critical for day to day health.

Saying "But it produces antibodies" is akin to the line in Idiocracy where they keep saying "but it's got electrolytes" where they keep spraying sports drink on their crops, which kills their crops.

The antibodies are a secondary effect, the main effect is to critically damage your body at the cellular level.

Jonestown style arguments were used to push this poison from the outset...

Replace "it's Kool Aid" with "it's a vaccine"... and you've conned half your victims already, you get the picture... The substance isn't exactly what they told you it was.

"For everyone's safety" was another underhand trick, when the substance on offer is toxic, therefore it's not safe for anyone, (and could never stop a respiratory pathogen...

They told half truths

"it gives your body a message to make the antigen, so you can mount an immune response"

rather than saying your cells will start making a foreign cytotoxic protein, which will cause your immune system to attack your own cells, your own cells will get conflicting messages interfering with important genetic expression and causing dysfunction...

End result is likely cellular death, tissue necrosis, cellular dysfunction, autoimmunity and cancer, to name but a few...

Plus your immune system is now preoccupied with a specific protein, so your immune system is compromised rather than enhanced...

It was poison from the outset and never a contender to fight a disease, they had a great story to make you volunteer to inject this poison. You need IgA antibodies to prevent or tackle a respiratory illness, not blood borne IgG antibodies to Covid/SARS CoV 2, which is what an injected vaccine will do, only create IgG.

So there was no use poisoning your body in the hope you wouldn't catch whatever "covid/SARS " was in the first place.

Why?

Profits are great but free human guinea pigs are even better ...

How else would you find out how well this poison might work than to have people volunteer their arms for it, albeit on false pretences...??

Then you can get great data on how well this covert poison works

Even better it was an opportunity to check out how good we've gotten with propaganda and psyop creation.

Did they want us all dead ? Maybe...

Sterilised? Maybe...

But did they want to see the effects of systemic wide distribution of errant mRNA codes in a human being?

For sure they did...

And they wanted to see how it effects the very young to the very old. I thought it was a mistake and about profits at first, but with all the known consequences already and for it not to be off the market AND for countries to expand mRNA in big dollar deals with western govt...

It is not a mistake. It's deliberate.

Even if they are reluctant to admit mRNA vaccine's known dangers, governments should be backing away quietly, not ramping up supply with factories and billion dollar investments.

This is coming from someone who was blindly asleep and trusted our government implicitly to get us through.

Even the operation to push the sheep and opposition to focus solely on vaccines (rather than vaccines being some inconsequential thing that you rarely thought about) now they have engineered two sides, at each other's throats like sports team fans, this required planning.

This wasn't some surprise disease (if it was anything at all).

I only had a vague memory of cellular biology from uni 30 years ago, but I was dumbfounded for all reasons above when they said they were injecting man made mRNA to tackle a respiratory infection...

It was deadly and dangerous in theory to do this, so why did we?

Then the side effects started to mount up, yet it was still on the market even though the benefits (none) did not outweigh the risk (death and injury).

My old textbook from uni sums up the critical importance of mRNA signalling in your cell, so critical it should never be interfered with...

Raven and Johnson "Biology" 2nd edition (1989) which had some great colour diagrams around page 302, and very clear explanations of our cellular operations.

Even better the few paragraph summary on page 309, spells everything out in basic terms...

"REGULATING GENE EXPRESSION... A CELL must know not only HOW to make a particular protein, but also WHEN. "It is important for an organism to be able to CONTROL WHICH of its GENES ARE BEING TRANSCRIBED, AND WHEN".

* Even at this point, the question arises why interfere with this system?

"From a broader perspective, the growth and development of multicellular organisms entails a long series of biochemical reactions, each DELICATELY TUNED to achieve a precise effect."

*Precise effect, delicately tuned...

Again why interfere in something so important?*

I won't go on but here's a link to the book, really worth checking out something published well before the plans were being hatched to modify science.

https://archive.org/details/biology0000rave_02ed/mode/1up

Expand full comment
Soujourner's avatar

Maria, this was one of your best. Thank you for your perseverance, may God continue to bless you, Brava!

Expand full comment
60 more comments...

No posts