Those emails on the SV40 from Health Canada: Update with corrections

Pfizer lies, HC knew about Kevin's work in July 2023, tries to get FDA/EMA involved

I looked at the emails uncovered via FOIA (or ATIP in Canada) regarding the SV40 contamination obtained from Scoops Magoo who really knows how to write an ATIP.

Emails from Health Canada re SV40 contamination in Pfizer vax

Here are my overall impressions plus a few choice emails

1. sometime in early July, Dean Smith, head of vaccine division found out about the SV40 elements in the vaccine. I believe it was due to a contact at the FDA because of Kevin McKernan's presentation to the US FDAs VRPAC meeting June 22, 2023

2. July 21, 2023. The package from Pfizer for the XBB vaccine comes in. It is sent to all the scientists reviewing the vaccine WITH KEVIN MCKERNANS PREPRINT ATTACHED TO IT, July 21st

3. Then HC scientists have a meeting about it and decide to send Pfizer some clarification questions. Sent out August 5th. They get a bunch of answers they aren't thrilled with. Send out another for clarification on the 22nd and again on the 30th.

4. Dean Smith tries to get the FDA and EMA interested

5. Finally in October the EMA contacts HC and says they are getting a lot of media requests and we should have a meeting about it. FDA is noncomittal. Finally they decide they will get together Dec 1 2023, but these emails just go until the end of October.

6. HC gets Pfizer to commit to some studies regarding the size distribution of the DNA and whether their circular DNA can replicate in bacteria etc. Pfizer complains to HC that NO OTHER REGULATOR is concerned.

7. HC scientific staff preparing to answer media requests, noted that no other vaccine approved by Health Canada has SV40 elements or uses SV40 plasmid elements in its production and that it shouldn’t be there. DNA fragments are hard to get rid of, so the solution is not to use it in the plasmid in the first place.

That is kind of the over impression I have.

Who approved the XBB vaccine despite concerns from the vaccine safety guys?

What is going on at CBER in the FDA? 

No wonder they released these emails. Makes HC look good comparatively. Holy Toledo.

First here is the package that the HC scientist got to review the Pfizer XBB vaccine (first page) on July 31st, 2023. This is likely because of Epoch Times sending a media request to Health Canada on the SV40 issue and residual DNA levels on July 17, with the McKernan findings, and on July 19 you see the first Health Canada internal email discussing SV40. Thanks Noe Chartier and Matt Harwood. They cracked this open.

Attached to the documents is the April 2023 preprint of Kevin McKernan on his find of the contamination. The whole thing. Plus a link to his presentation June 22, 2023 to the VRBAC of the FDA. Holy Toledo.

Here in August 17, 2023 HC scientist tries to get the EMA and FDA together to talk about this.

.

Background on questions asked by HC to Pfizer

Here are the questions HC asked of Pfizer and their laughable responses Questions asked Aug 4, 2023

So how did Pfizer grow their bacteria and the plasmids? They added kanamycin to the broth so that only the plasmids with the resistance gene would grow and then they would know they had the right plasmid. Standard Operating Procedure.

Holy Toledo. It is all about the tiny weeny amounts of SV40 sequences? Nothing about the LNPs, nothing about the SV40 binding to P53 or its ability to bring DNA into the nucleus?

Well, better talk to Phillip Buckhaults then. He’s finding more than 10ng/dose in the earlier vials. Consistency? Pfft. And it will take time to generate? Umm I think you can do this in a few days.

Here is HC questions to the THIRD clarification asked of Pfizer. HC doesn’t have any peer reviewed safety concerns? Maybe it is because the SV40 regulatory elements are pretty well banned to be used in human medicines???

Here is the final overall review by HC scientists on the XBB vaccine. Approved Sept 28, 2023

So they approved it despite some outstanding issues on the SV40 and levels of contamination.

Meanwhile The Head of Vaccine Safety is still trying to get the FDA and EMA to discuss the contamination in October (after the XBB vaccine has been approved). Here he is talking about Pfizer to his counterparts, and notes the Pfizer is complaining that only HC is concerned, and is grateful for the EMA support (not coming from the FDA BTW). Common trick they play. You’re an outlier.

FDA is tracking discussions on this, and they will join HC and the EMA, but only IF HELPFUL? What the heck?

A good assessment here by Dr Wu with whick I agree with completely. I had thought it was Supriya Sharma but I was informed it was not. Why am I not surprised?

So where is the FDA on this. Distinct feeling the FDA does not want to address this. Maybe HC scientists listen to these presentations? It is very useful after all.

This needs some more work but I thought I would get some preliminary stuff out.

Please share and comment and yes, pray the rosary.