"ribosomal frameshifting, stop codon readthrough and ribosomal pausing resulting in aberrant proteins of all kinds from the N-1-methylpseudouridine"
Ribosomal frameshifting is used to print proteins out of the poly-A tail. These aren't aberrant proteins, they are purposely packed into the tail. The technique is often used to print luciferase, which is then used as a reporter gene.
"the 5' cap designed to compete for preferential access to ribosomal complex/reducing translational capacity of other critical proteins"
The patents list viruses with IRES's. The IRES is a loop near the 5 prime cap that allows additional reads. Using an IRES, they can print 2, 3 or 4 proteins. The result is that cell resources are depleted and can no longer work effectively.
The patents are the only place to look. Taking a vial here or there does not represent the whole. There are 1500 peptides listed in a single patent, and that can be spread over many lots. Viruses with IRES's also go to the brain and that's why they don't want to touch the patents.
Yes, that poly A tail! I wrote an substack entry on the tail. Not enough attention is being brought to that tail.
I also researching possible IRESs in 2022 and am very suspicious of an IRES in Moderna's 3'UTR. Did you know Moderna changed the 3'UTR for the bivalents? And the regulators let them get away with it?
Furthermore, as admitted by Pfizer scientists in Patel et al, there is the hidden gene, the reverse ORF spanning the entire spike protein. How did it get there? Unlikely to be accidental.
I know C1ORF134 is in the list, have to look to see if more are there. C1ORF134 was removed from gene banks. I believe genecards still shows a page though. It's a secretory peptide in the 1p36 cytogenic band. Same area as Deletion Syndrome.
Lysosomal storage diseases? I have a theory that much of the effects of the vax is a kind of lysosomal storage disease due to the fact that most of the LNPs are not released from the endosomes (about 2-10% of all LNPs end up making spike protein) and the endosomes mature into lysosomes causing disease.
We can have an excellent discussion about where the nasty little spike proteins are buzzing around in the cell and how they slip out of the cell afterwards.
However, there are a few points to bear in mind:
Every cell in the body has a certain function. Otherwise it wouldn't be there.
If a virus comes along and “wants” to infiltrate a cell, it usually only works on certain cell types. Otherwise it makes no sense for the “virus”.
In my opinion, this modRNA and co. is much worse than a natural virus.
In my opinion, it is a synthetic virus structure that can infiltrate ALL(!) cells compared to a natural virus.
This is tragic for the cell, as it is not normally built to produce huge quantities of complex junk proteins.
It's like gene therapy with a hand grenade! It will end up somewhere.
And if, for example, a heart muscle cell or a nerve cell in the brain is forced to produce only junk proteins, it will no longer be able to do its actual job. Because it is supposed to do something else.
I also still don't understand how the poor little cell can properly package all these junk proteins and “excrete” them on its cell surface. So that may be ok for two or three proteins per week. But they are now producing huge quantities. And it all has to be packaged, then transported to the surface to be “pooped out”. And if something goes wrong in the process - then the inside of the cell comes out with it and an autoimmune attack is inevitably the result. Exactly the same if there is not enough “packaging material”. Then it produces and produces and produces, and the whole cell fills up with crap.
In other words, just because you have started the copying process does not mean that the finely tuned rules for packaging, production control and “separation” are also set correctly.
But never mind - “the muscle cell in the upper arm only has to present a spike on the surface”. That's what we were told.
I would also like to point out that as long as the manufacturers cannot clearly explain to me why they are using the sv40-dna door-opener in this gene therapy and what exactly they want to insert into the dna and why, this whole vaccination story is a large-scale poisoning campaign. Across generations.
The comparison that many papers make between the effects of covid versus mRNA injections on the body is disingenuous. One is injected into the body which by-passes our immune system and the other is met by our respiratory system immune barrier which offers protection from the effects of a virus. Not in all cases although it is hard to determine as the iatrogenic damage by our health professions when trying to treat a respiratory infection wrongly was worldwide and muddied the waters. If I had to I would rather face a respiratory virus being assured I would have the correct treatment if necessary than these awful injections. Thank you for your determined and relentless research which is producing so much information, it is very much appreciated.
The Russian scientist is Marina Kolevatykh (appears like a real name, hard to imagine someone would make up a fake person with a last name like this, they would chose something simpler). Can you please post a link to the paper, I can read it in Russian and let you know.
I read the article. It's not so wonderful, IMO. It basically states:
1)covid pandemic was real and was due to some sort of natural, very dangerous virus from Wuhan (LMAO!!)
2) vaccines saved millions of lives (yeah, right...) but there are some issues with "American" and "European" manufactured mRNA vaccines;
3) lists all the horrid stuff we all know about this poison;
4) Conclusion: "now that the very dangerous Sars-Cov-2 virus mutated into not very dangerous variants" Sputnik and Sputnik Light are the best choices of vaccines to continue injecting.
IMO this is basic propaganda on behalf of whoever gets paid when Sputnik covid vaccines get sold.
At the end of the day, there is no difference between the other publications. So it shows one thing: “Science”™ is, uh, “open border”™: corrupted through and through and you can confidently sort out the last 40 - 70 years of publications and search for the few genuine research papers on signal transduction, carcinogenesis, mitochondria, etc. that are to be taken seriously. And first of all, please kick out all epidemiological bullshit modeling! - Falsified data, concealed data, inaccessible data, selectively cherry-picked and snotty pharmaceutical funding.
Thank you and very good sleuthing! By now, of the words Vax and Good are used in same sentence, the odds of puppet At Work Here, alarm goes off. Again, if not for you (straight to the heart) and Katherine W. This stack would not have as many dedicated Facts regarding the massacre.
I agree. Nothing new, data wise. It is the framework for understanding harm for physician and researchers that I believe is helpful. Many of them really don’t understand how these products actually work.
Thank you for this article. I think everyone who has followed the story of the mRNA injections knows by now that the cationic charged LNPs are toxic and have no place in the human body. This is chemical poisoning of the organism and this alone should have been enough to sound major alarm bells and have the platform suspended. I have a problem when it comes to the cartoon drawings produced by the manufacturers and their supporters to impress people that there is some technological wizardry behind these shots. Is that supposed to somehow negate the primary problem with injecting a toxic chemical poison? But further than this, I see no good evidence for the advertised and hyped mechanism of transfection taking place. Unless I am mistaken, the evidence that human cells can be turned into spike protein production ‘factories’ seems to rest only on the results of ELISA or similar antigen assay tests. These, at best, can only provide an indirect inference but not any actual proof that expression takes place. So I am totally sceptical about this so-called science and tend to think that all harms caused are due to primary toxic poisoning.
"ribosomal frameshifting, stop codon readthrough and ribosomal pausing resulting in aberrant proteins of all kinds from the N-1-methylpseudouridine"
Ribosomal frameshifting is used to print proteins out of the poly-A tail. These aren't aberrant proteins, they are purposely packed into the tail. The technique is often used to print luciferase, which is then used as a reporter gene.
"the 5' cap designed to compete for preferential access to ribosomal complex/reducing translational capacity of other critical proteins"
The patents list viruses with IRES's. The IRES is a loop near the 5 prime cap that allows additional reads. Using an IRES, they can print 2, 3 or 4 proteins. The result is that cell resources are depleted and can no longer work effectively.
The patents are the only place to look. Taking a vial here or there does not represent the whole. There are 1500 peptides listed in a single patent, and that can be spread over many lots. Viruses with IRES's also go to the brain and that's why they don't want to touch the patents.
Great comment.
Yes, that poly A tail! I wrote an substack entry on the tail. Not enough attention is being brought to that tail.
I also researching possible IRESs in 2022 and am very suspicious of an IRES in Moderna's 3'UTR. Did you know Moderna changed the 3'UTR for the bivalents? And the regulators let them get away with it?
Furthermore, as admitted by Pfizer scientists in Patel et al, there is the hidden gene, the reverse ORF spanning the entire spike protein. How did it get there? Unlikely to be accidental.
I know C1ORF134 is in the list, have to look to see if more are there. C1ORF134 was removed from gene banks. I believe genecards still shows a page though. It's a secretory peptide in the 1p36 cytogenic band. Same area as Deletion Syndrome.
Holy Toledo!
I'm not a geneticist, but when I search for C1ORF134, it comes up:
C1ORF134 seems to influence/reduce granulin production/regulation.
production/control.
Granulin is a protein that is derived from progranulin (PGRN)
Progranulin (PGRN) deficiency is associated with the following:
frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and
neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCL)
Neuronal ceroid lipofuscinoses (NCLs) are a group of rare,
inherited (...) neurodegenerative diseases that belong to the lysosomal storage diseases.
storage diseases.
They are characterized by the accumulation of autofluorescent material (ceroid lipofuscin) in neurons and the retina.
Clinical features
The characteristic symptoms of NCLs include:
Progressive decline in mental and other abilities
Epilepsy
Loss of vision due to retinal degeneration
Dementia
Disorders of movement coordination (ataxia)
Granulin also controls
Cell growth and cell survival
Wound healing
Inflammation regulation
Neurotrophic and neuroprotective functions
Lysosomal function
do I need to worry??
Lysosomal storage diseases? I have a theory that much of the effects of the vax is a kind of lysosomal storage disease due to the fact that most of the LNPs are not released from the endosomes (about 2-10% of all LNPs end up making spike protein) and the endosomes mature into lysosomes causing disease.
We can have an excellent discussion about where the nasty little spike proteins are buzzing around in the cell and how they slip out of the cell afterwards.
However, there are a few points to bear in mind:
Every cell in the body has a certain function. Otherwise it wouldn't be there.
If a virus comes along and “wants” to infiltrate a cell, it usually only works on certain cell types. Otherwise it makes no sense for the “virus”.
In my opinion, this modRNA and co. is much worse than a natural virus.
In my opinion, it is a synthetic virus structure that can infiltrate ALL(!) cells compared to a natural virus.
This is tragic for the cell, as it is not normally built to produce huge quantities of complex junk proteins.
It's like gene therapy with a hand grenade! It will end up somewhere.
And if, for example, a heart muscle cell or a nerve cell in the brain is forced to produce only junk proteins, it will no longer be able to do its actual job. Because it is supposed to do something else.
I also still don't understand how the poor little cell can properly package all these junk proteins and “excrete” them on its cell surface. So that may be ok for two or three proteins per week. But they are now producing huge quantities. And it all has to be packaged, then transported to the surface to be “pooped out”. And if something goes wrong in the process - then the inside of the cell comes out with it and an autoimmune attack is inevitably the result. Exactly the same if there is not enough “packaging material”. Then it produces and produces and produces, and the whole cell fills up with crap.
In other words, just because you have started the copying process does not mean that the finely tuned rules for packaging, production control and “separation” are also set correctly.
But never mind - “the muscle cell in the upper arm only has to present a spike on the surface”. That's what we were told.
I would also like to point out that as long as the manufacturers cannot clearly explain to me why they are using the sv40-dna door-opener in this gene therapy and what exactly they want to insert into the dna and why, this whole vaccination story is a large-scale poisoning campaign. Across generations.
I don't actually know if people need to worry; they won't release any information about the vax.
Genecards still has it as missing. I found it through alias Q5TEV5.
Q5TEV5 was deleted on October 7, 2020. Most of the previous entries read similar to:
ID CA134_HUMAN Reviewed;
83 AA...
DE RecName: Full=Putative uncharacterized protein C1orf134;
DE Flags: Precursor;
GN Name=C1orf134;
OS Homo sapiens ...
DR PRIDE; Q5TEV5; -.
HGNC:32021;... C:extracellular region; IEA:UniProtKB-SubCell.
PE 3: Inferred from homology; KW Complete proteome;
Glycoprotein; Reference proteome; Secreted; Signal. FT SIGNAL 1 20 {ECO:0000255}. FT CHAIN 21 83 Putative uncharacterized protein FT."
From this we learn that C1orf134 is a signal peptide, glycoprotein, secreted. Whatever is attached has a high probability of also being secreted.
The specific cytogenetic band is 1p36.13.
The nearby gene with snake venom qualities is PLA2G2A.
The comparison that many papers make between the effects of covid versus mRNA injections on the body is disingenuous. One is injected into the body which by-passes our immune system and the other is met by our respiratory system immune barrier which offers protection from the effects of a virus. Not in all cases although it is hard to determine as the iatrogenic damage by our health professions when trying to treat a respiratory infection wrongly was worldwide and muddied the waters. If I had to I would rather face a respiratory virus being assured I would have the correct treatment if necessary than these awful injections. Thank you for your determined and relentless research which is producing so much information, it is very much appreciated.
The Russian scientist is Marina Kolevatykh (appears like a real name, hard to imagine someone would make up a fake person with a last name like this, they would chose something simpler). Can you please post a link to the paper, I can read it in Russian and let you know.
https://fsmj.ru/file/15/000/000569.pdf
Here it is and thank you. I think her assessment is great (mostly because it is in line with mine of course, lol).
RUSSIAN STUDY TRANSLATED
https://e.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=kZO9HKZvpiKcOvwIrXmXCYgWxLgs43cJrfV
I read the article. It's not so wonderful, IMO. It basically states:
1)covid pandemic was real and was due to some sort of natural, very dangerous virus from Wuhan (LMAO!!)
2) vaccines saved millions of lives (yeah, right...) but there are some issues with "American" and "European" manufactured mRNA vaccines;
3) lists all the horrid stuff we all know about this poison;
4) Conclusion: "now that the very dangerous Sars-Cov-2 virus mutated into not very dangerous variants" Sputnik and Sputnik Light are the best choices of vaccines to continue injecting.
IMO this is basic propaganda on behalf of whoever gets paid when Sputnik covid vaccines get sold.
At the end of the day, there is no difference between the other publications. So it shows one thing: “Science”™ is, uh, “open border”™: corrupted through and through and you can confidently sort out the last 40 - 70 years of publications and search for the few genuine research papers on signal transduction, carcinogenesis, mitochondria, etc. that are to be taken seriously. And first of all, please kick out all epidemiological bullshit modeling! - Falsified data, concealed data, inaccessible data, selectively cherry-picked and snotty pharmaceutical funding.
Thank you!
Thank you and very good sleuthing! By now, of the words Vax and Good are used in same sentence, the odds of puppet At Work Here, alarm goes off. Again, if not for you (straight to the heart) and Katherine W. This stack would not have as many dedicated Facts regarding the massacre.
Seems a well rounded summary for the newcomer but nothing much new.
I agree. Nothing new, data wise. It is the framework for understanding harm for physician and researchers that I believe is helpful. Many of them really don’t understand how these products actually work.
Fooled again! Washed out..
Go deceive elsewhere!
Trying to be nice.
Thank you for this article. I think everyone who has followed the story of the mRNA injections knows by now that the cationic charged LNPs are toxic and have no place in the human body. This is chemical poisoning of the organism and this alone should have been enough to sound major alarm bells and have the platform suspended. I have a problem when it comes to the cartoon drawings produced by the manufacturers and their supporters to impress people that there is some technological wizardry behind these shots. Is that supposed to somehow negate the primary problem with injecting a toxic chemical poison? But further than this, I see no good evidence for the advertised and hyped mechanism of transfection taking place. Unless I am mistaken, the evidence that human cells can be turned into spike protein production ‘factories’ seems to rest only on the results of ELISA or similar antigen assay tests. These, at best, can only provide an indirect inference but not any actual proof that expression takes place. So I am totally sceptical about this so-called science and tend to think that all harms caused are due to primary toxic poisoning.
Thanks Howard!! Damn good and straight talk about crooked presentation propaganda. Good show!