16 Comments
User's avatar
Amat's avatar

The comparison that many papers make between the effects of covid versus mRNA injections on the body is disingenuous. One is injected into the body which by-passes our immune system and the other is met by our respiratory system immune barrier which offers protection from the effects of a virus. Not in all cases although it is hard to determine as the iatrogenic damage by our health professions when trying to treat a respiratory infection wrongly was worldwide and muddied the waters. If I had to I would rather face a respiratory virus being assured I would have the correct treatment if necessary than these awful injections. Thank you for your determined and relentless research which is producing so much information, it is very much appreciated.

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

The Russian scientist is Marina Kolevatykh (appears like a real name, hard to imagine someone would make up a fake person with a last name like this, they would chose something simpler). Can you please post a link to the paper, I can read it in Russian and let you know.

Expand full comment
Washed Up Pharmacist's avatar

https://fsmj.ru/file/15/000/000569.pdf

Here it is and thank you. I think her assessment is great (mostly because it is in line with mine of course, lol).

Expand full comment
Sasha Latypova's avatar

I read the article. It's not so wonderful, IMO. It basically states:

1)covid pandemic was real and was due to some sort of natural, very dangerous virus from Wuhan (LMAO!!)

2) vaccines saved millions of lives (yeah, right...) but there are some issues with "American" and "European" manufactured mRNA vaccines;

3) lists all the horrid stuff we all know about this poison;

4) Conclusion: "now that the very dangerous Sars-Cov-2 virus mutated into not very dangerous variants" Sputnik and Sputnik Light are the best choices of vaccines to continue injecting.

IMO this is basic propaganda on behalf of whoever gets paid when Sputnik covid vaccines get sold.

Expand full comment
Genervter Bürger's avatar

At the end of the day, there is no difference between the other publications. So it shows one thing: “Science”™ is, uh, “open border”™: corrupted through and through and you can confidently sort out the last 40 - 70 years of publications and search for the few genuine research papers on signal transduction, carcinogenesis, mitochondria, etc. that are to be taken seriously. And first of all, please kick out all epidemiological bullshit modeling! - Falsified data, concealed data, inaccessible data, selectively cherry-picked and snotty pharmaceutical funding.

Expand full comment
Unbekoming's avatar

Thank you!

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Thank you and very good sleuthing! By now, of the words Vax and Good are used in same sentence, the odds of puppet At Work Here, alarm goes off. Again, if not for you (straight to the heart) and Katherine W. This stack would not have as many dedicated Facts regarding the massacre.

Expand full comment
Mercuriell's avatar

Seems a well rounded summary for the newcomer but nothing much new.

Expand full comment
Washed Up Pharmacist's avatar

I agree. Nothing new, data wise. It is the framework for understanding harm for physician and researchers that I believe is helpful. Many of them really don’t understand how these products actually work.

Expand full comment
Charlie's avatar

Fooled again! Washed out..

Go deceive elsewhere!

Trying to be nice.

Expand full comment
Howard Steen's avatar

Thank you for this article. I think everyone who has followed the story of the mRNA injections knows by now that the cationic charged LNPs are toxic and have no place in the human body. This is chemical poisoning of the organism and this alone should have been enough to sound major alarm bells and have the platform suspended. I have a problem when it comes to the cartoon drawings produced by the manufacturers and their supporters to impress people that there is some technological wizardry behind these shots. Is that supposed to somehow negate the primary problem with injecting a toxic chemical poison? But further than this, I see no good evidence for the advertised and hyped mechanism of transfection taking place. Unless I am mistaken, the evidence that human cells can be turned into spike protein production ‘factories’ seems to rest only on the results of ELISA or similar antigen assay tests. These, at best, can only provide an indirect inference but not any actual proof that expression takes place. So I am totally sceptical about this so-called science and tend to think that all harms caused are due to primary toxic poisoning.

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

Thanks Howard!! Damn good and straight talk about crooked presentation propaganda. Good show!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 25
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Washed Up Pharmacist's avatar

Great comment.

Yes, that poly A tail! I wrote an substack entry on the tail. Not enough attention is being brought to that tail.

I also researching possible IRESs in 2022 and am very suspicious of an IRES in Moderna's 3'UTR. Did you know Moderna changed the 3'UTR for the bivalents? And the regulators let them get away with it?

Furthermore, as admitted by Pfizer scientists in Patel et al, there is the hidden gene, the reverse ORF spanning the entire spike protein. How did it get there? Unlikely to be accidental.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 26
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Washed Up Pharmacist's avatar

Holy Toledo!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 27Edited
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Washed Up Pharmacist's avatar

Lysosomal storage diseases? I have a theory that much of the effects of the vax is a kind of lysosomal storage disease due to the fact that most of the LNPs are not released from the endosomes (about 2-10% of all LNPs end up making spike protein) and the endosomes mature into lysosomes causing disease.

Expand full comment